Annals of the ICRP
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 1-39 , December 2005

Contents, preface, executive summary, chapters 1 and 2

  • J. Valentin

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +46 8 729 7275; fax: +46 8 729 7298.

  • Image Result

    Dose-specific excess relative risk of solid cancer among atomic bomb survivors, 1958–1987, by interval of neutron-weighted, estimated radiation dose to the colon. Fitted dose–response functions corres

    Dose-specific excess relative risk of solid cancer among atomic bomb survivors, 1958–1987, by interval of neutron-weighted, estimated radiation dose to the colon. Fitted dose–response functions correspond to statistical tests of increasing trend according to the linear (relative risk=1+αD) and log-linear [relative risk=exp(βD)] dose–response models. The baseline risk is adjusted for city of exposure (Hiroshima or Nagasaki), sex, and 5-year intervals of exposure age and age at observation for risk, using a saturated model.

  • Image Result
    General dose–response model, excess relative risk (ERR)(D)=αD×(1+βD)×exp(–γD−δD2), fit to the dose–response data of Fig. 2.1, and linear dose–response model, ERR(D)=αD, fit to the data subset restrict

    General dose–response model, excess relative risk (ERR)(D)=αD×(1+βD)×exp(–γD−δD2), fit to the dose–response data of Fig. 2.1, and linear dose–response model, ERR(D)=αD, fit to the data subset restricted to radiation doses between 0 and 2 Sv. Details of the parameter estimates are given in Table 2.2. ERR, excess relative risk.

  • Image Result
    Estimated low-dose relative risks. Dose-specific cancer rates over the 1958—1994 follow-up period relative to those for an otherwise similar exposed person, averaged over the follow-up, for sex, and f

    Estimated low-dose relative risks. Dose-specific cancer rates over the 1958—1994 follow-up period relative to those for an otherwise similar exposed person, averaged over the follow-up, for sex, and for 30 years of age at exposure. The dotted lines represent 1 standard error limits for the smoothed curve. The straight line is the estimated linear dose–response relationship for 0–2 Sv (see inset). The unity baseline corresponds to zero-dose survivors exposed within 3 km of the bombs. The horizontal dotted line represents the alternative baseline if survivors exposed beyond 3 km had been included. Source: Pierce, D.A., Preston, D.L., 2000. Radiat. Res. 154, 178–186.

  • Image Result
    Linear regression estimates of the excess relative risk (ERR) per Gy (points and connecting line, with error bounds of ± one standard error) for solid cancer incidence, based on Poisson regression ove

    Linear regression estimates of the excess relative risk (ERR) per Gy (points and connecting line, with error bounds of ± one standard error) for solid cancer incidence, based on Poisson regression over dose intervals of differing ranges from zero to the horizontal co-ordinate of the plotted point. The analysis is limited to proximal survivors exposed at distances under 3 km.

  • Image Result
    Linear regression estimates of the excess relative risk (ERR) per Gy (points and connecting line, with error bounds of ± one standard error) for solid cancer incidence, based on Poisson regression ove

    Linear regression estimates of the excess relative risk (ERR) per Gy (points and connecting line, with error bounds of ± one standard error) for solid cancer incidence, based on Poisson regression over dose intervals of differing ranges from zero to the horizontal co-ordinate of the plotted point. The analysis is based on all exposed survivors with estimated radiation doses less than 2 Gy.

  • Image Result
    All-age linear regression estimates of excess relative risk (ERR) per Gy for female breast cancer assuming a 12-year minimum latent period, with dose-specific data trimmed from the right. Horizontal p

    All-age linear regression estimates of excess relative risk (ERR) per Gy for female breast cancer assuming a 12-year minimum latent period, with dose-specific data trimmed from the right. Horizontal placement corresponds to the mean breast tissue dose for the highest neutron-weighted kerma interval included in the regression. Thus, the rightmost point corresponds to the full dose range, the next point to the left to doses under 4 Gy, the next to doses under 3 Gy, and so on.

PII: S0146-6453(05)00048-5

doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2005.11.002

Annals of the ICRP
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 1-39 , December 2005